Social inequality and sense of place in crime fiction

Ian Rankin fans will enjoy reading his conversation with the Indian communist leader Prakash Karat, who has read all his 17 Inspector Rebus novels and did his Master's in politics at the University of Edinburgh, in Rankin's hometown.

Rankin talks about his working-class parents, his being the first from his family to go to university — he read English at the University of Edinburgh — and his early struggles as a writer. Knots and Crosses, his first Rebus novel published in 1987, wasn't a hit with the critics and readers. Instead, piquantly, he became a crime suspect as the plot resembled a murder case, he says!

Success came only 10 years later with Black and Blue, his eighth Rebus book.

Now, says the Hindu, "Ian Rankin is the best-selling writer of crime fiction in the United Kingdom, accounting for 10 per cent of all its crime book sales."

The Indian newspaper published his conversation with Karat during his visit to India last month under the headline, "Crime fiction is about social inequality". You can read it here and here.

The headline is a direct quote from Rankin.

Discussing politics and crime fiction with the Indian communist leader, he says:

I think crime fiction is almost like a product of capitalism. It’s about social inequality. Why do people do bad things to each other? Much of the time, it’s economic. It’s to do with basic human nature — greed, a sense of injustice, other people having things that you want, a sense of grievance that something’s happened at work. That’s what I like about crime fiction specifically. It tells us that the civilised world is just a veneer, a very thin veneer.

Continue Reading

The Complaints: No Rebus but pure Rankin

IanRankin Police procedurals don't get better than The Complaints. Ian Rankin is in riveting good form. I couldn't put down the book until I finished it. And it doesn't even feature Inspector Rebus, who had his swansong in Exit Music, published in 2007.

The Complaints, published last year, presents a new hero: Inspector Malcolm Fox, also one of Edinburgh's finest, but not a criminal investigator like Rebus; Fox's job is to investigate other cops. He is the man from Internal Affairs, or what in Edinburgh is called the Complaints. Here, however, he himself is under investigation, apparently for the murder of his sister's live-in boyfriend. But, as he fights to clear his name, he discovers he is being framed by dirty cops and gangsters.

Continue Reading

India’s communist problem

Newsweek’s international edition’s cover this week articulates my own feelings. "Why India is blowing its chance", says the headline above a picture of a dejected Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. And the subhead adds,"The architect of the boom has a plan to vault India into the great-power club, only the communists stand in the way".

What it doesn’t say is, the communists also maintain relations with the communist party of China, which has a border dispute with India and helps Pakistan in various ways.

Anyone who follows the news knows how China feels about India’s growing closeness to the US. But the Chinese needn’t worry; they can count on their Indian communist friends to stall the Indo-US nuclear energy agreement.

Prakash Karat, general secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), is fiercely opposed to the deal, calling it a bid to "encircle" China. He cuts an almost Stalinist figure in the Newsweek article, which begins:

From his fortress-like red sandstone headquarters near New Delhi’s Connaught Place — a bustling commercial hub lined with McDonald’s, foreign banks and boutiques — Prakash Karat, India’s reigning communist ideologue, is fighting to kill his country’s
economic- and political-reform process…

That Karat — the feisty, British-educated
59-year-old general secretary of the Communist Party of India
(Marxist), or CPI-M — has come to dominate New Delhi’s agenda is
remarkable, given that he has little national following, has never held
elected public office and holds ideas that were already out of date 15
years ago, when most communist systems came crashing down… That’s because the
Congress Party-led coalition has just a razor-thin majority in
Parliament, which has forced it to lean on Karat for support, turning
him into a kingmaker…

Karat even threatened to bring down the government over the nuclear issue. But he was advised to cool it by party leaders from the communist-ruled state of West Bengal who have their own problems. After three decades in power, they are meeting armed resistance from peasants in Nandigram where they want to acquire land and build chemical plants. They don’t want the Congress party to step into the conflict. So Karat has not been able to carry out his threat, but he could still wreck any nuclear deal, says Newsweek.

Newsweek simplifies the issue by casting the communists as the only opponents to the deal. The Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party and Indian scientists have also raised objections. But they have cited national interests, not a plot to "encircle" China.

A Newsweek online article which calls it a "sweetheart deal" glosses over the constraints it places on India, which became a nuclear power on its own. But could India get a better deal?

The Economist says:

To most neutrals, this looks like a steal for India. It has an urgent
need of imported uranium to cope with a worsening energy shortfall. The
special treatment that the deal would afford India would confirm its
rising status, and cement a growing friendship with America. Yet that
is what the communists object to.

That doesn’t make the communists sound very friendly or patriotic, does it?

%d bloggers like this: